CHAPTERS
- Introduction
- A Revolution by Vatican II?
- What is Inspiration ?
- A Revolution by Pius XII?
- Using Genre to defend Inerrancy
- How to Interpret Scripture
- The l964 Instruction of the Biblical Commission
- Which are the Inspired Books?
- The Pentateuch
- Genesis
- Exodus
- Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy
- Joshua, Judges and Ruth
- Samuel, Kings, Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah
- Pre-exilic Prophets
- Exilic and Post-exilic Prophets
- The Psalms
- The Wisdom Literature
- Daniel
- The Two Books of Maccabees
- Judith, Esther, and Tobit
- The Gospels
- The Acts of the Apostles
- St. Paul's Epistles
- The Catholic Epistles
- Study Questions
- Selected Answers
Books/Resources by Fr. Most
- EWTN Scripture Q & A
- Basic Scripture
- Bible Commentaries
- Our Lady in Doctrine And Devotion
- Outline of Christology
- An Introduction to Christian Philosophy
- The Living God
- The Holy Spirit and The Church
- Catholic Apologetics Notes
Apologetic Resources
- Ask Father
- Biblical Catholicism
- Theology/Philosophy
- Scripture Resources
- Scott Hahns Lectures
- Apologetics Links
Other Services
- Catholic Chaplaincy
- St. Anthony Communications
|
Chapter 13 The Books of Samuel, Kings, Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah
The two books of Samuel were probably originally one book, and similarly
for the two books of Kings. Some versions, following the Septuagint, call
these same books the four books of Kings.
The pattern in these books is the familiar deuteronomic picture: sin brings
punishment, repentance and good bring salvation. They are basically
historical, with perhaps a bit of freedom since they are written chiefly to
give the deuteronomic message, with illustrations from history.
Samuel was born of a mother who had long been sterile, but obtained him by
prayer. He proved to be the last of the judges, the first of the prophets.
When he was still quite young, she gave him to the service of the temple at
Shiloh, where Eli was the priest. While there, God spoke to him, and told
him of the doom awaiting the house of Eli because of the wickedness of
Eli's sons, who died in the battle of Aphek, c. 1050.
In 4:3 we meet a strange line (if we translate the Hebrew literally - most
versions soften it). When the battle was over the Hebrews said: "Why did
the Lord strike us today before the face of the Philistines?" They knew
well the Philistines had hit them, but it was common to attribute to the
direct action of God things He only permitted - we saw this in the case of
the hardening of Pharaoh's heart before the Exodus.
After the defeat, the Hebrews brought the ark of the covenant, hoping it
would protect them. But the Philistines defeated them and captured the ark
itself. But God sent plagues upon the Philistines, so that they returned
the ark, along with gold ornaments, in reparation. Strangely, when the ark
did return, it was neglected until David later brought it to Jerusalem.
The defeats were making clear that the loose organization of Israel, held
together chiefly by having a central shrine, could hardly match the skilled
Philistines, who also had a monopoly of iron working (1 Sam. 13:19-22).
Further, when the people saw that the sons of Samuel, by then old, were
corrupt, they asked him for a king. He was reluctant, and God was
displeased, yet he did give them a king. (there is no conflict between the
attitudes shown in chapters 8 and 9 as is often charged: God and Samuel
regret, but grant the request).
In 1 Sam 9:14-27, God reveals to Samuel His choice, Saul. In chapter 10,
Samuel goes through the ritual of choosing a king by lot - of course, God
managed the lots. (Normally it is wrong to call on lots to learn God's
will, unless there is a special divine inspiration). Saul was made king at
Gilgal, c. 1020.
For a time, Saul had considerable victories over the Philistines. But soon
he disobeyed twice. First when Samuel did not come in time to offer
sacrifice before a battle, Saul did it himself (13:8-15). Samuel reproached
him saying: "Obedience is better than sacrifice." The outward sign, the
offering of an animal, is valuable only if it expresses the interior
disposition, which is basically obedience to God. This was true even of the
sacrifice of Jesus: Rom 5:19. So Samuel meant that without obedience, the
offering was worthless, and worse. Later, in chapter 15, Saul violated the
ban, in saving King Agag of Amalek and the best sheep. Saul pleaded he only
wanted the sheep for sacrifice. Samuel again rejected his plea, told him
again, God would not continue his dynasty. There is no reason why Saul, in
stubbornness, could not have done both things, so claims of a clash here
are not warranted.
We ask why God rejected Saul's dynasty for these two sins, but did not
reject David for greater sins, adultery, covered by what amounted to
murder. The answer lies in a distinction of two orders, the external, and
the internal order. The external order deals with what position a person
will have, e.g., king, legal specialist, scholar etc. The interior order is
concerned with the attainment of eternal salvation. Since God wills all to
be saved (1 Tim 2:4), he offers grace in this interior order very
abundantly. We receive all those graces which we do not reject. But in the
exterior order, the rule is that the Spirit gives what He wills, where He
wills (cf. 1 Cor 12:11). We do not know the reason for the choice of
David, but he was, after the sins we mentioned, unusually meek and holy.
Perhaps God wanted such a one to be an ancestor of His Son.
Then, in chapter 17, David, a young man, slew the Philistine giant,
Goliath. Saul seemed happy at first, but when the women went out singing:
"Saul slew his thousands, David his ten thousands", Saul became jealous,
probably insanely jealous. He pursued David to kill him. He even killed the
priests of Nob for having aided David.
At the cave of Adullam, David could have easily killed Saul, but did not do
so, saying meekly he would not touch the anointed one of the Lord. A second
incident of the same sort is told in chapter 24.
After this, Samuel died. Soon Saul had to face a large Philistine force. He
went to a medium at Endor, asked her to call up the spirit of Samuel. She
did, and Samuel told him he and his sons would be killed in battle the next
day. Among them died Jonathan, who had been a fast friend of David.
Soon after the death of Saul, c. 1000 BC, Judah accepted David as king in
Hebron. Later the northern tribes also accepted him.
David then conquered Jerusalem, made it his capital, brought the ark there.
One day David chanced to see a woman washing herself on a nearby roof. It
was Bathsheba, wife of Uriah. David sent for her, and she conceived. To
cover up, he invited Uriah to dine with him, hoping he would go to his
wife, and thus the sin would be covered up. Uriah did not. So David had him
put in the front line in battle, deserted, so he would die. Nathan the
prophet came and rebuked David, who promptly repented.
In his last years, David's son Absalom, after winning people over by
flattery, proclaimed himself king. David ordered his forces to spare
Absalom, but they did not. David wept bitterly.
Near the very end, another son, Adonijah, proclaimed himself king. But
Bathsheba, with the help of Nathan, induced David to appoint their son
Solomon as king, and to crown him at once.
David had wanted to build a temple to the Lord, but Nathan in an oracle
told him instead that the Lord would build a house, an everlasting dynasty,
for him (2 Sam. 7). His son Solomon, under whom Israel reached a height of
prosperity greater than before or since, did build that temple. After he
dedicated it, God told Solomon of His pleasure, but also warned that if he
or his successors proved unfaithful, He would take his presence from there,
destroy the temple, and scatter them over the earth (1 Kings 9).
God offered Solomon any gift, Solomon asked for wisdom. Yet in spite of
that, he because fatuous later on, married many foreign wives, and built
shrines for their gods. Of course the people gladly joined in the false
worship, to which they were so prone.
Therefore (1 Kings 11) God told Solomon there would be a punishment, but
not in his lifetime, because of the goodness of David.
The punishment came in a special way. When Solomon died, Judah readily
accepted his son Rehoboam as king. But the northern tribes assembled at
Shechem and asked Rehoboam to modify the harsh taxes and forced labor
Solomon had imposed on them (1 Kings 12). His father's advisors urged him
to comply, but his younger friends said otherwise. He told them: My father
beat you with whips, I will beat you with scorpions. The punishment was
withdrawal of light to Rehoboam (cf. Isaiah 29:14).
The northern kingdom withdrew, creating a split that never healed. They
chose Jeroboam as their king. He built shrines at Dan and Bethel, each with
a golden bull, to keep people from going to Jerusalem. The northern kingdom
lasted until 721. King Hoshea, foolishly hoping for help from Egypt,
refused tribute to Assyria. Then Assyria took Samaria, and brought the
northern kingdom to an end.
The remainder of the books of Kings tell a sad, and mostly dull tale: all
the kings of the north followed in the footsteps of the sins of Jeroboam.
Of the southern kings, only Hezekiah and Josiah escape criticism. To reward
Hezekiah, God protected Jerusalem from being taken by Sennacherib of
Assyria in 701; Josiah too was good ruler, but thinking Assyria was
weakened (and it was) tried for independence, and failed. He himself died
in the battle of Megiddo in 609, trying to keep Egypt from aiding Assyria.
His son Jehoiakim (609-598) undid his father's reform. Judah became a
vassal of Assyria. Assyria fell to a coalition of Babylonians and Medes.
When Jehoiakim thought Babylon was weak, he revolted. He was dead by the
time Nebuchadnezzar II of Babylon came down in 597 and sacked the temple
and city, deported thousands of upper-class citizens and the next king,
Jehoiakin, son of Jehoiakim. Nebuchadnezzar put on the throne the weak
Zedekiah. He refused the advice of Jeremiah. Nebuchadnezzar came again in
587, deported more leading citizens, left only some of the country's poor.
There is a bright spot in the otherwise dull story of the kings: the cycles
of stories about Elijah (1 Kings, 17:1 - 19-21) and Elisha (2 Kings 2:1 -
8:29). Elijah was the great prophet whose coming at the end is foretold by
Sirach 48:10, Malachi 3:23-24, and by Our Lord Himself in Matthew 17. He
also appeared with Jesus at the transfiguration. Elisha is praised briefly
in Sirach 48:12-15. So they were real figures. Some, unfortunately, speak
of their stories as mere legends.
The two books of Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah form a unit, and were
probably originally one. The separation of Ezra and Nehemiah came centuries
later.
The Chronicler - for we may think of the author of all four parts by that
name - had a purpose different from that of the deuteronomists: he wanted
to show that worship like that conducted by David, with full observance of
purity laws, was the way to insure the future of Israel. The dynasty of
David was gone, so this was the real means of unity. Hence the Chronicler
devotes much space to the reign of David, and does not mention his sins.
The opening chapters of First Chronicles is largely just genealogies, from
Adam to the start of the monarchy. Detailed coverage starts only with the
beginning of the rule of David. Then the narrative runs closely parallel to
Samuel and Kings, which are drawn on extensively, except that information
on the northern kings is practically absent.
Cyrus of Persia in 539, as part of a more enlightened policy, allowed the
Hebrews to return from exile, and encouraged them to rebuild their temple.
The ten northern tribes did not return, they had been absorbed. But Judah
and Benjamin did go back. However, they did not at once rebuild the temple,
so God urged them through the prophet Haggai in 520, and then the temple
was completed in 515. There had been opposition from the Persian governor
of Samaria, which was finally resolved when the decree of Cyrus was found
in the royal archives, searched by command of King Darius.
The second major event was the reordering of Jewish life in Jerusalem,
through the work of Ezra and Nehemiah. Here chronology is a problem. Ezra
7:1ff says Ezra's ministry started in the seventh year of Artaxerxes;
Nehemiah 2:1 says Nehemiah's work began in the twentieth year of
Artaxerxes. The trouble is that there were three Persian kings with that
name.
Nehemiah 8 describes a week-long occasion when Ezra read the Law to the
assembled people, while the Levites explained it. Some scholars think this
work of the Levites was really the beginning of Targums - for many of the
Jews during the exile had changed from the Hebrew to the Aramaic language.
Both Ezra (9-10) and Nehemiah (13:23-27) denounced marriages of Jews to
nonJews. Ezra actually called on them to dismiss their foreign wives and
children!
There has been much discussion of the original structure of this four part
work. The reconstruction by F. M. Cross "A Reconstruction of Jewish
Restoration," in Journal of Biblical Literature (94 [1975] 4-18) has won
much favor. He proposed three stages: 1)First and Second Chronicles, after
chapter 9, was composed between 520, when the temple foundation was laid,
and its completion in 515; 2)The work of Ezra, half a century later; 3)
Near 400 B.C., a final editor inserted the memoirs of Nehemiah and added
the genealogies of First Chronicles 1-9.
|