CHAPTERS
- Introduction
- A Revolution by Vatican II?
- What is Inspiration ?
- A Revolution by Pius XII?
- Using Genre to defend Inerrancy
- How to Interpret Scripture
- The l964 Instruction of the Biblical Commission
- Which are the Inspired Books?
- The Pentateuch
- Genesis
- Exodus
- Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy
- Joshua, Judges and Ruth
- Samuel, Kings, Chronicles and Ezra-Nehemiah
- Pre-exilic Prophets
- Exilic and Post-exilic Prophets
- The Psalms
- The Wisdom Literature
- Daniel
- The Two Books of Maccabees
- Judith, Esther, and Tobit
- The Gospels
- The Acts of the Apostles
- St. Paul's Epistles
- The Catholic Epistles
- Study Questions
- Selected Answers
Books/Resources by Fr. Most
- EWTN Scripture Q & A
- Basic Scripture
- Bible Commentaries
- Our Lady in Doctrine And Devotion
- Outline of Christology
- An Introduction to Christian Philosophy
- The Living God
- The Holy Spirit and The Church
- Catholic Apologetics Notes
Apologetic Resources
- Ask Father
- Biblical Catholicism
- Theology/Philosophy
- Scripture Resources
- Scott Hahns Lectures
- Apologetics Links
Other Services
- Catholic Chaplaincy
- St. Anthony Communications
|
ANSWERS: BASIC SCRIPTURE COURSE 525
The following are a number of answers to the study questions designed for
the Basic Scripture course by Father William Most. Note that these
answers are not complete however, but rather are brief, and restricted to
the more difficult questions.
Did Vatican II or Pius XII revolutionize Scripture studies?
No. Pius XII encouraged more freely the use of literary genres, which was
not forbidden before, but not encouraged. Vatican II made no further
change.
What is meant by literary genre?
It is a pattern of writing, within which some things are asserted by the
author, others not. e.g, in a modern historical novel the author asserts
the main line is history, does not assert the fill-ins.
How answer those who claim to see so many errors in scripture?
A large part of the answer is found in noting that DV says that whatever
is asserted by the human author is asserted by the Holy Spirit. But many
things are not asserted, as we learn from checking literary genre of each
part of Scripture.
DV 11 says Scripture contains without error what God wanted there for
the sake of our salvation. Are other things open to error?
No, DV itself showed by notes taking us to such texts As
Vatican II, which says God Himself is the Chief Author - hence no error
possible in the things that are asserted.
What principles did Vatican II give for Scripture study?
We must remember that the Holy Spirit is the chief author of all, so one
part of Scripture does not contradict another. And there is no error at
all. We must always check to see if a proposed interpretation would clash
even by implication with any Church teaching.
Is it enough for inspiration to be free from error?
No, also, we must say "God Himself is the chief author, who uses a free
human instrument, but causes him to write what God wants, without error.
How can we know which books are inspired?
Only by decision of the providentially protected Church.
They say there is no such thing as an uninterpreted report - so this
undermines all history, including Gospels.
There is some truth in the saying, but some things have so simple a
structure that there is no room, e.g., a leper stands before Christ
asking to be healed. He says: "I will it. Be healed." No room for
interpretation in that account.
The first Gospels may have been written 40 or more years after Christ -
how could they get the facts?
Some of the writers probably were eyewitnesses. Even if not, Pope
Clement I, in his letter to Corinth of c 95 AD says Peter & Paul were
of his own generation. They probably died c 67. So he must have heard
them. Also we have Ignatius of Antioch who came from the see where
Peter had worked not long before; and Quadratus, saying some in his day
were still alive who had been cured by Christ or raised by Him. Even if
not in 123, this covers easily 80-90 AD when many say Mt. & Lk were
written.
How prove the Church has a teaching commission from Christ?
Six points:There was a man Jesus who, (2) claimed to be sent from God;
and (3) proved He was by miracles done with a tie to the claim and, (4)
in the crowds He had a smaller group, the Twelve and, (5) told them to
continue His teaching and, (6)Promised protection:"He who hears you
hears me." Our sketch of apologetics did not show anything about
a Pope. True, but once we have a group or church commissioned to teach
by someone sent from God, and promised protection, that group can tell
us there is a Pope and what he can do. Also, two major Protestants,
Albright and Mann in Anchor Bible, Matthew agree with our reading of
Matthew 16.
What did Luther think Paul meant by faith?
Only confidence the merits of Christ are credited tome. Really if we
read all of Paul, faith includes:believe in God's words, confidence in
His promises, and obedience to His commands. Luther omitted the third,
said we could sin freely.
What is genre of chapters 1-11 of Genesis?
Probably ancient stories, (could have been borrowed from
Mesopotamia, but not really likely) used to bring out things
that happened, e.g., God made all things, in some special way made
first pair, gave some sort of command, they violated it, fell from
favorer grace. Church never taught fundamentalism. Even
Augustine said, about the clay image, that God does not have
hands. St. John Chrysostom said the Eve incident should not be taken
crudely.
What is the Documentary theory?
Says Pentateuch was put together out of 4sources, Yahwist, Elohist,
Priestly Code, Deuteronomist. We may believe theory, need not. Many
scholars today are dropping it.
May we consider evolution?
Not atheistic, but theistic, said Pius XII in 1950. But scientific
evidence for it is very scant.
What is likely the genre of: Pentateuch 12 ff?Joshua, Judges, Jonah, Daniel?
Pent. is probably epic; Joshua also, Judges, more factual, Jonah
unclear, may be extended parable; Daniel includes edifying narrative and
apocalyptic.
What areTargums?
Ancient Aramaic versions of OT, mostly free, with fill-ins to show how
Jews understood it">. So we can understand messianic prophecies better
than some scholars do today.
What levels of Church teaching are there?
1) Definitions; 2) Universal teaching when showing it
is meant to be definitive - infallible; 3) decisions of Pope in documents
in Acta on debated questions: infallible; 4) things not presented as
definitive.
What are the three stages in development of Gospels?
1) Words and acts of Jesus, adapted to current audience; 2) Way Apostles
& others preached these things, with adaptation of wording to audience;
3) some individuals under inspiration wrote down part of this basic
preaching:this is the Gospel. So the Church has something more basic
than Gospels, its own ongoing teaching. What method of study builds on
what we just said? Form and Redaction criticism tries to find at which
of the 3 stages our present text was formed, and so find out
some things. Can be useful, often is abused.
What is polygenism?
Theory that our race came from several pairs. Statement
of Pius XII in 1950 may rule it out some debate that. But Allan Wilson
of UC. at Berkeley by study of mitochondria said we all come from one
mother, 3500 yrs. Ago. Many scientists accept the view, lowered it to
200, 000 yrs.
What is original sin?
In us, it is lack of the grace that should be there, i.e., a pure
privation.
What was the coordinating gift or gift of integrity?
When God called: Adam where are you? and Adam said: I
hid, was naked, we see Adam before the fall had no shame for nakedness,
afterwards did - so had lost the means of easily controlling all
drives. That gift was a coordinating gift.
Name two messianic prophecies from Genesis.
Targums see Gen 3:15 as such (enmity between you and the woman) and Gen
49:10 (Scepter will not depart from Judah until messiah comes).
How did Gen 49:10 come true?
Was always some ruler from tribe of Judah until Herod in 41BC. who was
not of that tribe, by birth half Arab, half Idumean.
When was the Exodus?
Two chief theories: one says 1290 (Jews built store cities, in Ex 1:11
, which have been excavated); others say around 1445 (Solomon began to
build temple in 4th year of reign which was 480 yrs after Exodus). What
do we do if archaeology seems to contradict OT? Recall many buildings
were mud, washed away - there was some site shift - only a fraction of
sites usually excavated -- check genre of the passage.
What did Sinai covenant provide?
A people to get favor on condition of obedience.
Lv 4 speaks of involuntary sin. What is it?
Violation of command of God without knowing the fact requires a
sacrifice, to restore damaged objective moral order.
God sometimes ordered Hebrews to wipe out a city:herem. Was it immoral?
No, the adults had sinned mortally; children in it
had not, but life is a moment to moment gift: God decided to stop giving
it, using Hebrews as a means. Killing is wrong precisely because it is
a violation of rights of God, the Lord of life.
Why did Israel wander for 40 years?
First spies sent in to see the land lied, said people
were giants. God then punished them by making them wait until
that generation had died out.
What is the nature of Deuteronomy?
Mostly speeches of Moses, and repeat of earlier books. Seems dramatization.
Why does God give commands?
1) He loves all that is right - that says creatures should obey their
creator; 2) He wants to give good to us, but we need to be open:
commands tell us how to be open to receive.
What choice did Dt 30 give?
Blessing for keeping covenant, curse for sins.
Kenyon expedition could not find walls of Jericho that had fallen. But
Bryant Wood did find them. Kenyon made other serious mistakes in
excavating Jerusalem.
What is the deuteronomic pattern?
God warns, people keep on sinning, He punishes, they repent, He
restores them.
How many books of Samuel were there?
Probably originally our 1 & 2 Sam were one book of
which 1 &2 Kings were also part.
How can we show whether the Hebrews knew of survival after death?
Many today deny that they knew, appeal to a supposed unitary concept of
man, i.e., a body with breath in it. But the determined belief in
necromancy we find in the OT shows they did know of a survival (Lev
19:31 and 20:6; Dt 8:11), even if they did not knowhow to reconcile
that with a possible unitary concept of man.
Who built the first great temple?
Solomon. God told David he , David, had shed too much blood. This was not
sinful, God had commanded his wars. But it is a matter of fittingness.
Why was there a split into two kingdoms?
Solomon and the people sinned, punishment was a
foolish ruler, Rehoboam, whose folly led to the split. When did the two
kingdoms fall? North fell in 621; south in 597 & 587.
Probable relation of Chronicles to Ezra-Nehemiah?
Probably all parts were originally one book - cf. cases of 1&2 Sam and
1 & 2 Kings.
How did the great exile end?
Cyrus of Persia conquered Babylonia in 539.
Which prophet first foretold the fall of Samaria in 621?
Amos in 786-46.
What was sense of "I want mercy and not sacrifice?"
Really means God wants hesed, covenant fidelity, more than external
rites.
Who was the child in Isaiah 7:14 and 9:5-6.
Targums saw child of 9 as Messiah, which implies same for child of 7.
By multiple fulfillment (a prophecy can go through more than once) it
would be both Hezekiah, son of Achaz, and Jesus. What two other major
prophecies are found in Isaiah? In 11, Messiah will
have the Divine Spirit; in 53, He will suffer terribly.
Why did the prophets speak against sacrifice?
They did not, they really meant God wants interior dispositions of
obedience and not just external rites.
What is the greatest prophecy of Jeremiah?
The new covenant in 31:31, which was made by Jesus in Upper Room.
Which prophet said the son would not suffer for father's sins?
Ezekiel 18.
Which is the most messianic of the prophets next to Isaiah?
Zechariah, who foretold the entry into Jerusalem, the
piercing of the Messiah, His being sold for 30 piece of silver.
Which Psalms have messianic prophecies?
Chiefly 2 and 22.
Was everything in wisdom books a religious teaching?
No, much was worldly wisdom, interspersed with religious ideas.
How could Job and Sirach and Qoheleth speak darkly about survival?
The afterlife then was much different from now, a drab limbo of the
Patriarchs.
Does Daniel include future prophecies?
Most of the things in chapters 7ff seem to refer to
time of Antiochus IV, yet some features seem to mean the times of
Christ.
What text shows belief in purgatory?
2 Maccabees 12. We can also show it by noting that in
Mal3:2 God is a refiner's fire: "Who can stand when He appears?".
So the soul must be pure to be united with Him forever - not just total
corruption as Luther held.
What is genre of Tobit, Judith and Esther?
First two probably edifying narrative; second may be more historical.
Must we know the names of the Gospel writers? Why?
Need not, enough to know they tried to get things right, the for sake of
their own eternity, and had the means to get the facts. See answer to
qu. 14 on this. (Often in those times writers used a pen name, often that
of a famous man).
What is the synoptic problem? Why? the Two Source theory?
There are some similarities in the text and even wording of the
Synoptics - many say then that Mark wrote first, Mt and Lk used him, plus
a course Q (German Quelle = source) for things not in Mark. This view is
under some attack today. Evangelists could have each had their own
traditions, which were careful of wording.
Did Evangelists always keep the very words of Jesus and sequence of
events?
Neither. They would adapt wording to current audience, and arrange events
according to the special purpose they had.
Are the Infancy Gospels historical? Give reasons.
Yes, Paul VI, John Paul II, and Vatican II show they
consider them historical. Objections easily answered.
What of the census in Luke?
There is a new solution now">. Pick the eclipse of Jan
10, 1 Bc as the one just before death of Herod. Then we know there was
a registration to take oath of allegiance to Augustus before he
was named "Father of his country" Feb 5, 2 BC. Real governor of Palestine
would have gone to Rome, put Quirinius in as acting governor for the
registration. As to coins showing successors began to rule in 4 BC -
this sort of pattern is well known in ancient things, and Herod had
special reason:was in bad with Augustus, wanted to use names of
Hasmoneans.
What of the differences in genealogies in Mt and Lk?
Genealogies then often were not family trees, were artificial to bring
out other things.
What of fact W. Harrington says Our Lady did not believe in Him, as
shown in Mk 3:20 ff.
But Mark would not contradict Luke, who shows her as first believer. If
she went with that group - uncertain - she need not have agreed with
them, might have wanted to hold them down, as most mothers would do.
When did Our Lady learn Jesus was to be Messiah? Soon as Angel said He
would reign over house of Jacob forever - then all the prophecies would
begin to come to mind.
What of the "brothers of Jesus"?
Hebrew had few words for relatives, used ah for most things. Even
though Gospels were in Greek, NT Greek often uses Greek words in such
a way we need to think of the Hebrew to understand. And James
the "brother of the Lord" was still alive in 49 at Council of
Jerusalem: Jesus would have asked him to care for her.
What was purpose of parables?
Made possible for well-disposed to get more and more; ill-disposed
less and less, as Isaiah had foretold.
Did Jesus really speak against Pharisees, or was it just the later Church?
Gospels could retroject some things He actually said, from after to
before Easter. But cannot fake by retrojecting what Henever did say.
Did Jesus at once reveal who He was?
No, used gradual self-revelation, especially by "Son of Man"which
evoked Daniel 7. Had He said at once, "I and the Father are one" they
would have stoned Him.
What was the messianic secret?
Wrede in 1901 said Jesus never said He was Messiah - Church was
embarrassed, faked incidents where matter would come up, but He asked for
secrecy. Wrede appeals to raising of daughter of Jairus as clear case
- anyone could see she was alive. But Jesus needed only enough time of
silence to slip out and get on way to next city, so crowd would not
proclaim Him King Messiah.
When did Jesus find out who He was?
From first instant of conception, according to teaching of Church, His
human soul saw vision of God, whence He knew everything that was to come
upon Him, and all His mission.
How great was suffering of His Mother at cross?
All holy souls must positively will what God positively wills so she
was asked to positively will His horrid death, in spite of her love so
great we cannot understand that love, according to Pius IX.
Lk 2:52 says Jesus advanced in wisdom.
St. Athanasius showed He did not grow in actual wisdom, but
in manifestation of what He already had. Jesus said in Mk 13:32 He did
not know day of end. Gregory the Great said He knew the day in His
humanity(registered on human mind) but not FROM His humanity.
What does kingdom mean in Gospels?
Ancient words often had a span of meaning. Kingdom often meant Church
in this world or next, cf. parable of wicked tenants:kingdom to be
taken from them = they would no longer be members of People of God.
Why did Jesus often break the Law?
Never did, broke foolish oral additions by Pharisees, such as the Korban
teaching which let them break the 4th commandment. He said He came not
to destroy but to fulfill.
Did Jesus contradict Paul - Jesus said He came to fulfill law, Paul
said we are free from law.
Paul meant that keeping law does not earn salvation, though breaking it
can earn punishment: Rom 6:23. Jesus said same in saying we must be like
little children, who get things because parents are good, without
earning it, though they could earn to lose inheritance.
What was difference of Pharisees and Sadducees?
Pharisees held all oral law, believed in survival
after death, retribution in next life. Sadducees denied
survival, denied the oral law.
Who was guilty of the death of Jesus?
All who sin are guilty in general in special way, those Jews who were
before Pilate calling for His death. But Pilate tried to get Him free,
fault was with Jews. Jews today try to deny the guilt of their
ancestors.
Can we be sure Jesus worked miracles?
In His day even His enemies admitted He worked cures and exorcisms -
attributed to magic or devil, did not deny">. Were some of those He
exorcised really just epileptics? Possibly, but not all. He did not
come to teach science, but to heal souls and bodies.
Was not Jesus just much like Apollonius of Tyana?
Not at all - Latter was just a philosopher, his "miracles"not like
those of Jesus, e.g., he quieted a satyr with wine, gave a threatening
letter to a ghost instead of commanding the devil to go out.
NJBC says Jesus always refused to appeal to His miracles to prove claims.
Not so, the cases cited by NJBC are all foolish, e.g., He refused a
miracle to amuse Herod, refused to come down from cross etc. But often
He did appeal, e.g., John 5:36 and 14:10 and Mark 2.
Was the Last Supper a Passover celebration?
John and Synoptics seem not to agree. Pharisees celebrated on Thursday
eve to avoid breaking Sabbath; Sadducees used Friday evening. And when
Passover fell on a Sabbath, some lambs were sacrificed on Thursday eve
to avoid running into sabbath rest.
Who foretold the New Covenant? How does it apply to the redemption?
Jeremiah 31:31 foretold it. Covenant condition was obedience, basically
that of Jesus (Rom 5:19) to which His Mother's obedience was joined,
not as adding - her whole ability came from Him, but as making things
richer in good order (cf. Is 19:5.c., and LG 61).
To whom was price of redemption paid? Was it infinite?
Not to satan, nor to the Father(not the captor) but in God's love of all
holiness to rebalance the objective moral order. It was infinite, work of
an Infinite Person, and gives an infinite title for the whole race, and
also infinite title for each individual: cf. Gal 2:20 and GS 22.
If merits of Christ are infinite, then we cannot do anything, need not
do anything.
This forgets the syn Christo theme of St. Paul e.g, Rom 8:17:"We are
heirs together with Christ, provided we suffer with Him so we may be
glorified with Him". cf. also Romans 6:3-8; Col 3:1-3; Eph 2:5-9; Rom
8:9. We get in on the claim He established insofar as we are members of
Him and like Him.
How do we know He promised to be with the Church until end of time?
Cf. Mt 28:18-20 and parables of weeds and net. Would it not be ridiculous
to suppose He became incarnate and died for just one generation?
Make sequence of Easter events.
Magdalen & others come to tomb, find it empty run to Apostles -- they
refuse to believe, but Peter & John run to tomb, see it is empty, do
not see Jesus - Magdalen stays, sees Jesus - goes to Apostles again -
He appears to Peter - then to two on road to Emmaus - the two find
Peter has seen Jesus - He appears to the Eleven without Thomas -
returns when Thomas is there -- more appearances at Lake of Galilee.
Who was Beloved Disciple?
Some question today. But was John - was one of inner three-surely not
Peter, not James, who was martyr in 42.
Does Acts disagree with Epistles?
No. Paul in Acts & Romans 1 & 2 does preach repentance. Acts show
Paul in Nazirite ceremony - in 1 Cor he says he was all things to all
men. 2 Cor 11: Paul recounts his sufferings - in Acts we actually see
them. How could Paul tell Corinthians they can eat meat sacrificed to
idols, when Acts 15 forbids it. Only to converts in Syria and Cilicia--
when in that area Paul did preach rule of Acts 15.
Will everyone die?
No, 1 Thes 4:13 ff shows those alive at the parousia will never die. Is
there a rapture -- 1 Ths 4:13 depicts event in air, Last judgment is on
earth. Both passages have strong apocalyptic color - in that we do not
press details.
Will God offer all the grace of final perseverance?
Yes: 1 Ths 5:23-24; Phil 1:6; 1 C or 1:7-9. Trent says
we cannot be sure of having it - but if God offers, a man
may reject and not have it.
What is justification by faith?
Justification means the soul is transformed, made capable of face to
\face vision of God: 2 Peter 1:4 and 1 Cor 13:12, and becomes Temple of
Holy Spirit: 1 Cor 3:16 and 6:19. Faith includes three elements; cf
answer 14. Luther thought justification left one totally corrupt, was
only legal, and thought faith is just confidence merits of Christ apply
to me. What did Paul say of Law? We are free from law in sense that
keeping it does not earn salvation, which is an inheritance to children
of God; but not free to violate it, if we do, we lose our inheritance: Rom
6:23, 1Cor 6-9-10.
What are focused and factual views of Law?
In focused view, we as it were look through a tube, see only what is
within circle:law makes heavy demands, gives no strength, so we must
fall. In factual view, circle is removed, we see off to side, in no
relation to law, grace was given even in anticipation of Christ: outcome
is then good.
Gal 3:28 says in Christ we are neither male nor female. Why not
ordain women?
Paul spoke of getting justification by faith - not of all else too.
How do we know Paul believed in survival after death?
In Phil 1 he wants to be dissolved to be with Christ, in 2Cor 5 he wants
to leave the body to be present to God. And he was a Pharisee - they
believed in survival.
What does it mean Christ emptied self?
Gave up using divine powers for own comfort.
If God causes the good thought, the act of will and the doing, how
are we free under grace?
Actual grace comes, with no help from me makes me see something as good,
makes me well-disposed. At that point I could reject. If I merely make
no decision against grace, it continues in its course, then works in me
both the will and the doing while giving me power to cooperate.
How can Paul say all creatures are rubbish - God made them good?
Paul means on relative scale, comparing time and eternity.
How was incarnation and redemption nonsense to Greeks & Jews?
Greeks believed no god associated with men - Jews believed one who hangs
on the wood is cursed, and Messiah would never die.
In 1 Cor 6:11 Paul says that only some of the Corinthians had
committed the great sins; but in Romans 1 he implies all Greeks had done
all.How possible?
We saw in answer 95 that there are two ways of looking at law, focused
and factual. In 1 Cor 6:11 it is factual; in Romans 1it is focused: each
command in the law makes a heavy demand, gives no strength, so all fall
and sin against each major demand. Hence in Romans 2:1 each one is
guilty of the very same sins.
Church teaches we can reach perfection in any state in life. How can
Paul say celibacy/virginity is higher than marriage?
One gives greater means than the other, but the key is this:to follow
what one sees is God's will for him/her is not lacking in generosity, and
so perfection is possible. Marriage, from differences of male & female
psychology, requires much giving in, the opposite of selfishness, and so
can be a means of spiritual growth.
How does Paul show he does not believe in infallible salvation?
In 1 Cor 9:26-27 he says he is hard on his body so it will not lead him
into sin, and he might be lost in eternity. Chapter10 shows the
original People of God did not have it made from being such either.
How can Paul say in 2 Cor 3:5 we cannot even get a good thought by
our own power?
"Without me you can do nothing." Cf. 1 Cor 4:7.
In Romans 1-3 Paul wants to show all are hopeless if they try for
justification by law, can't keep it. But in 2:14-16 he says some gentiles
do make it by keeping law. How?
This is a factual picture, not the focused picture of Romans1-3 in
general. Some say Paul speaks in Rom 1 only of tendencies- but then
Paul's thrust would be void, for he is trying to prove that no one can
gain justification by keeping the law.
How can St. Justin say some in the past were Christians long before Christ?
Justin says also that the Divine Word is in all - not aspatial
presence. He writes the law on hearts (Rom 2:15), i.e., makes known what
morality requires. If a person obeyed that, he was following the Spirit
of Christ, without knowing what he was following. And also, in view of Rom
8:9, he belonged to Christ, and so was a member of Christ = member of the
Church, without external adherence of course.
What is "justice of God" in Romans 1:17?
Usual view:salvific activity by God. But a study of Hebrew sedaqah
shows it is God's concern for what is morally right, leading to reward
for the good, punishment for breaking covenant.
What is predestination?
A providential arrangement so a person gets full membership in the
Church - given without merits, but, it seems from 1 Cor 1and
elsewhere, it is given where more is needed. Predestination to heaven is
not mentioned in Scripture: however, God lets one go down who gravely
and persistently throws away, the only thing that could save him, grace;
but then predestines to heaven, without merits, those who do not resist
that way. Reason:He wanted to do so in first place, they do not block
Him.
What does word saved mean?
1) rescue from temporal danger; 2) entry into Church; 3) reaching
heaven. -- It never has the meaning of getting "infallible salvation".
What does Col 1:24 mean?
Paul wills to make up for deficiency of members of Christ who do not do
enough to rebalance objective moral order for their own sins.
What great mystery, once unknown, does Paul reveal in Col and esp. in Eph?
God calls gentiles too to be part of His people.
What does 2 Tim 2:2 call for?
Oral transmission of faith - pass on to those who can pass on to
others.
What is genre of Hebrews?
Except for introduction, it is homiletic: constant comparisons of old
Temple vs Christ. He earned title to all grace and forgiveness once for
all -- yet God in His love of good order wants a means or title for
giving it out, for which Christ provided saying, "Do this in memory of
me" -- Under same external sign as on Holy Thursday, obedient will of
Christ is presented as title for giving out graces -- to receive, we
must be members of His and be like Him (syn Christo theme, as in answer
175).
Hebrews 9:28 says Christ died once for all. How then is there room for
the Mass?
It is one thing for Christ to earn all forgiveness and grace, another for
a person to take it in - person must be disposed, open. For this, he must
be a member of Christ and like Him. Cf. the syn Christo theme. esp.Rom
8:17:"We are heirs with Christ, provided that we suffer with Him, so we
may also be glorified with Him."
Most striking things in Epistle of James?
Speaks of faith as only intellectual acceptance - stresses that if one
can control the tongue, he will do everything else too.
What are "spiritual sacrifices"?
Everything we do that is offered to God. Cf.LG 34.
Chief trends in interpreting Apocalypse/Revelation?
1) It is purely a book of consolation, no prophecy at all, 2) It is
consolation, adds some prophecies, hard to interpret, though Popes seem
to favor the woman clothed with the sun as Our Lady standing for the
Church.
Will there be a reign of the just with Christ on earth for 1000 years?
No, this was an early error on Apoc. 20. First resurrection is from sin -
to rule is to not be slave to sin - then
physical resurrection.
|