From paco@usmu01.usm.uni-muenchen.deTue Sep 16 15:56:26 1997
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 08:23:54 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Francisco Najarro <paco@usmu01.usm.uni-muenchen.de>
To: Ian Howarth <idh@star.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: BMW


Hi Ian,

See if this helps.

> Just to let you know that your files arrived safe and sound.   Actually,
> maybe you can also help with part of the discussion where the tapes 
> aren't too clear:
> 
> ====================================================================
> [Conti's talk]:
> 
> \noindent{\bf Najarro:}  What is the longest wavelength you're reaching?
> 
> \noindent{\bf PSC:}  Some of the things we were getting were down towards
> 2.3$\mu$m.
> 
> \noindent{\bf Najarro:}  Okay, you're getting the N$\;${\sc iii} line
> at 2.2\dots2.25. [XXX  Unintelligible sentence concerning various lines.]
> 
 I think it was just quoting that there are two NIII lines at 2.25 that are
well isolated compared to the NIII 8-7 at 2.11 which is blended with HeI 
and CIII 8-7

> \noindent{\bf PSC:}  What's the wavelength of it?
> 
> \noindent{\bf Najarro:} [Cautiously]  Two point {\dots}four{\dots}seven
> or so;  well, 2.5.
>
 There are two lines  5S 2**S(1/2) - 5P 2**P(1/2) at 2.250640mue  and  
 5S 2**S(1/2) - 5P 2**P(1/2) at 2.246500 both lambdas in air, the 2.24 mue 
 being twice stronger than the 2.25 one. 

 
 Cheers

 Paco