Ask Father Mateo
Msg Base: AREA 3 - ASK FATHER (AMDG)
Msg No: 34. Sun 8-16-92 10:33 (NO KILL)
From: Father Mateo
To: Scott Windsor
Subject: Excommunication
SW|Dear Father,
SW| I have been discussing the teaching of automatic excommunication with
| a friend of mine. He claimed that there is no such thing in the
| Catholic Church, and then stated he asked a priest (whom he did not
| name) and that priest allegedly agreed with him. I quoted him from
| the 1983 Code of Canon Law, specifically C 1314 wherein "ferendae
| sententiae" and "latae sententiae" are defined. I then listed a few
| canons that carried the "latae" sentence, including C 1382 which was
| applied to Archbishop Lefebvre; and C 1398, which applies to one who
| actually procurs an abortion.
SW| Could you shed some light on this issue?
SW|Dominus tecum,
SW|Scott
Dear Scott,
Here is a list of offenses punished by ipso facto excommunication:
1) apostasy, heresy, or schism (Can. 1364, 1);
2) violation of the sacred species (Eucharist) (Can. 1367);
3) physical attack on Pope (Can. 1370, 1);
4) absolution of an accomplice (Can. 1378, 1);
5) unauthorized consecration of a bishop (Can. 1382);
6) direct violation of seal of confession by a confessor
(Can. 1388, 1);
7) procuring of abortion (Can. 1389).
Source: Code of Canon Law: Text and Commentary. Canon Law Society of
America, 1985. p. 932.
Sincerely in Christ,
Father Mateo